DEATH AND DELIGHT ON THE HIGH C’S: Edmund Crispin’s Swan Song

Picture, if you dare, last month’s meeting of Book Club:

We gathered on Zoom with grave faces, struggling to figure out how to fill the two hours with talk about a very dull book. As it turned out, we made short shrift of a desultory conversation about The Gutenberg Murders and devoted the bulk of our time in a group attempt to make a winning selection for April.  

And it worked! How can you go wrong with a novel that begins like this: 

There are few creatures more stupid than the average singer. It would appear that the fractional adjustment of larynx, glottis and sinuses required in the production of beautiful sounds must almost invariably be accompanied – so perverse are the habits of Providence – by the witlessness of a barnyard fowl . . . These scarifying intellectual lapses are observable in actors as well – and it has long been noted that singers who are concerned with the theatre are more obtuse and trying than any other kind.

I won’t say that these sentiments are, erm, correct exactly. Let’s just say, as one who has dealt with actors, singers and dancers, too – oh Lord, dancers! –  on an intimate basis for over forty years, this is certainly how producers and directors feel about them much of the time. 

I can’t imagine why. 

The book in question is  Swan Song, the fourth mystery written by Edmund Crispin featuring his testy Oxford don and amateur sleuth, Gervase Fen. Crispin is the pseudonym of Robert Bruce Montgomery, who in the span of nine years (1944 to 1953) wrote just nine books about Fen but also wrote dozens of short stories, many of them collected in two books, Beware of the Trains and Fen Country

I think I read most of these when I was a much younger man, and yet I have few memories of them – except for a whopping sense of surprise when I got to the end of The Moving Toyshop (1946) and recognized the thrilling climax from Alfred Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train, who lifted the final battle on the merry-go-round straight out of Crispin’s book without giving the author a hint of credit. 

Both Swan Song and another mystery, Frequent Hearses, benefit from Montgomery’s interest in music and  his central career as a film composer. Hearses takes place on a film set, and Montgomery scored nearly forty films, including several in the Carry On series. Although he began writing mysteries when the heyday of classic puzzle crimes was fading, he was considered one of the last purveyors of true Golden Age-style detective novels. For the most part, Crispin’s output is well-plotted and well clued. 

Oh, and it’s also hilarious. Witness this description of a rehearsal:

On the stage, Rutherston could be heard complaining to George Green about the demeanor of the apprentices in the brawl at the end of the second act. ‘They scamper about,’ he said, ‘like a herd of deer attacked by a Pekingese.’ In the orchestra-pit, a trombonist was doing a very creditable imitation of a Spitfire diving, and a clarinetist was surreptitiously playing jazz. John Barfield was seated in the front row of the stalls, consuming a large orange.

One can only imagine the proportions of Barfield, an opera singer, as he always has something in his mouth. Crispin pokes fun at the egos and and artistic pains plaguing an opera company that has gathered in Oxford to put on Wagner’s Die Meistersinger, a feat of some significance in 1947, coming relatively soon after Hitler’s defeat. 

For the leading role, the producer has managed to secure the services of Edwin Shorthouse, a fine singer but a horrible human being. He is particularly horrible to women, considering himself quite the roue despite being described as “coarse-grained, middle-aged, ill-favored, conceited, and almost continually drunk.” He first makes a play for the lovely crime writer Elizabeth Harding, but she manages to dodge his advances and marry the much younger and incredibly charming singer Adam Langley. Shorthouse next targets a chorus girl with a hot-headed boyfriend and still finds time to run afoul of the company’s new conductor, an excitable wunderkind named Peacock, and in general earn the dislike of every member of the company. 

Thus it’s no wonder when late one evening Shorthouse is found in the nearly deserted opera house, hanging from a hook in his dressing room. The evidence of the old stage door guard would suggest suicide as the only possibility, but Adam’s friend Gervase Fen believes it to have been murder – and a locked room murder besides!

Did one of the above mentioned quartet of lovers do away with Shorthouse? Was it the temperamental conductor whom the victim had threatened to have fired? How about the delightful prima donna who loathed Edwin, or his brother, the famous – and famously crazy – composer, who admitted he had journeyed down to Oxford that very evening for the express purpose of murdering his brother? 

It takes another murder and several attempts on at least two more persons’ lives before Fen can put together a solution that is both original and delightful. I’ll admit that I had the second murder correctly figured out, based on a murder method that has popped up more than once, including in a very recent read. But the main murder, the impossible crime, totally dodged my limited deductive abilities. Sigh . . . impossible crimes usually do. 

From start to finish,  Swan Song is a lovely and quite funny read, but Crispin takes a few moments in this novel to wax seriously on the after-effects of the war, both on the English and on anti-Nazi Germans. The opera’s associate producer, Karl Wolzogen, trembles with excitement at this, the first British production of Wagner since the war, and although he views Hitler with contempt, he feels some resentment for the hatred the English maintain for his native land. 

A passing laborer wished him good afternoon, and glanced at him with quick, sharp curiosity when he replied. They distrust us, he thought. They distrust the Germans, and one can’t blame them. But they don’t realize that we distrust them, too. Dresden in ruins . . . The opera house gone; no longer any refuge for the shades of Weber and Wagner and Strauss . . . Perhaps he would welcome a visit from someone with the same background, the same memories, as himself.

Even Gervase Fen has a moment of utter seriousness connected to the war. In every interview, every meeting, at least one person comments that Edwin Shorthouse is better off dead, that his murderer should be rewarded rather than punished. To which Fen finally replies: 

“But none of us has the right to assess the value of a human existence. All must be held valuable, or none. The death of Christ and the death of Socrates suggests that our judgments are scarcely infallible. And the evil of Naziism lay precisely in this, that a group of men began to differentiate between the value of their fellow-beings, and to act on their conclusions. It isn’t a habit which I, for one, would like to encourage. “

I feel another consensus of Book Club is at hand this weekend, but this time we shall be gathering in joyful agreement. At least, I hope this to be true, just as I hope that our upcoming selections are as full of fair play and fun as Swan Song!

16 thoughts on “DEATH AND DELIGHT ON THE HIGH C’S: Edmund Crispin’s Swan Song

    • I always think these sorts of solutions to impossible crimes are meant to appeal to boys who liked to build machines and play with their chemistry sets. If I hadn’t been doing plays in the back yard, maybe I’d solve a couple of them!


      • Was that response meant to go to me Brad? But just so you know, the kind of mechanical John Rhode style solution does very little for me as I often fail to visualise the mechanism so it’s all a bit minor to my enjoyment. What I love about Carr is that the solutions are usually very simple to understand, once he explains them of course 🙂


        • No, not to you specifically, Sergio. I, too, love the Carr solutions that are elegant and simple. I do get why some would love Rhode’s tricks, which sometimes seem like a cross between science fiction and Little Known Facts. I just can’t visualize any of them, and very few Murder methods make me go “ooh” and “aah” when they’re revealed, including this one.

          Liked by 1 person

  1. This reminds me that I just received a new copy (well, not new-new, obviously) from Kate and it would be a perfect read today after a rough week. If you like audiobooks, the narrator of Crispin’s work on audible does a really lovely job.

    Liked by 1 person

    • How I wish Audible was free to those of us who subscribe to Amazon Prime! I’m feeling so bogged down by these individual subscriptions to one service or another! But it’s nice to know these are there should I ever avail myself of Audible; so many books I would LIKE to listen to seem to only be available there.


  2. One minor correction: the first eight novels about Fen were written between 1944 and 1951; the ninth did not appear until 1977,


    • Hmmm . . . I wonder if Crispin ran off for a while with Christianna Brand, who also had something of a gap and published HER final mystery in ’79. Let’s spread this gossip around and see what happens . . .


      • I think the received wisdom (which Donald Westlake once said was the only kind of wisdom in publishing), is that GLIMPSES OF THE MOON had been in a trunk for 25 years before coming out in the 70s. Crispin was very busy with his music and book editing and reviewing in the 50s and 60s, though it’s the heavy drinking that seems to have really slowed him down.


  3. I always considered Swan Song to be Crispin’s formal homage to his favorite detective novelist, John Dickson Carr, as the plot, or rather its structure, mirrors one of his famous novels. And while a reread is in order, I remember enjoying it and vaguely recall the locked room-trick.

    Since you’re such an unrepentant theater kid who struggles with impossible crimes, I’m curious what you would make of Herbert Resnicow’s The Gold Deadline. Resnicow specialized in architectural locked rooms and combined them on three occasions with his love for the theater, but The Gold Deadline stands out.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I do remember your positive reviews of Resnicow. Ever since my highly positive experience with Jack Vance, I have paid attention! I even bought one of Kip Chase’s mysteries on your recommendation. Of course, I do tend to act in your suggestions without reading them right away (*koff* *koff* Death Knell). It’s a fault I must correct one of these days.


  4. Fingers crossed this book receives universal love tomorrow, but unsurprisingly I don’t like to count my chickens until the eggs have hatched. It is always possible one within the group is the guilty party, of not liking it lol

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s